[Clyde Slick]

On Jun 24, 10:43*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 24, 8:55*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Jun 24, 8:57*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

Such as?

Unintended consequences. Like in previous legislation, going to
the energy saver flourescent bulbs. They are useless for
home security setups. watch property crime go up

Do you have any evidence of property crime going up due to different
bulbs? Please show your work.

Duh!!!
The law hasn't gone into effect yet.
The new bulbs are not yet mandatory, so they are not
used for that purpose.

BTW, Clyde, go back an reread what you wrote:

"Unintended consequences. Like in previous legislation, going to the
energy saver flourescent bulbs. They are useless for home security
setups. watch property crime go up"

You are saying that as a result of *previous* legislation "going to
the energy saver flourescent bulbs"..."are useless for home security
setups." Therefore, you say (or "at least" strongly imply) that as a
result of *previous* legislation property crime has gone up.

And to that I say "Duh!" LOL!

No, I am saying that they will go up
when the flourescent mandate kicks in.
thus, "Watch property crime go up"
I di not say it did go up, I said'it would go up
and that you should watch for it.