On Jun 22, 4:38*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Jun 22, 1:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jun 22, 1:51*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 22, 7:54*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jun 22, 1:46*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jun 22, 12:10*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jun 22, 12:12*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
After an investigation, the Ethics Committee found no evidence that
Frank had known of or been involved in the alleged illegal activity
and dismissed all of Gobie's more scandalous claims.[18][19]
Attempts to expel or censure Frank, led by Republican member Larry
Craig (who himself was later embroiled in his own gay sex scandal),
failed.[20][21] Rather, the House voted 408-18 to reprimand Frank who
later won re-election in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won
by larger margins ever since.[22]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_...mmittee_action
He is an idiot and immoral for letting himself be used.
That means your buddy 2pid is likewise "immoral".
I didn't know that he was a Congressman and that he had
the moral responsibilities of a Congressman. It's news to me!!!!!
Oh, you said someone not knowing something was "immoral".
2pid is really, really "immoral" then.
What are the "moral responsibilities" of a Congressman or any other
politician?
Clinton had oral sex with that Lewinski woman. Frank had this
(although in Frank's case the "immoral" argument is pretty weak).
His immorality is not because he "sucks dicks", it is because
he let a complete sleazebag into his life, and let him
have the run of his digs.
Don't forget he paid the guy. *Frank has the morality of George.
That alone should close the case.
Prostitution isn't a big deal, 2pid, as long as it isn't sexual
slavery. It's legal in your neighbor to the east.
I've never paid directly for sex, but dinner, drinks and a movie? ;-)