Amazement
On May 20, 10:53*pm, Kalman Rubinson wrote:
On 20 May 2009 23:06:24 GMT, wrote:
On May 20, 12:57*pm, "Harry Lavo" wrote:
So we have individual preferences. *But the fact that you don't like
multichannel is no reason to diss it, as happened in the original post of
this thread
I think it is a pretty darned good reason. This is a hobby of
aesthetics. If one doesn't like the aesthetic then one has a pretty
good reason to diss.
It is also a field of science and engineering. *Controlled studies
(see Toole's book for a review) have shown that multichannel
recordings are more accurate and believable conveyors of the original
event.
Now, if you don't like 'em, that's OK. *OTOH, you have no data or
science that validates your preference, so your 'dissing' doesn't rise
to more than a personal preference.
Huh? Preferences need data and science to be valid? Mine seem to work
just fine for me without any scientific validation.
|