Brian,
I'm holding up a finger for you. Guess which one.
1. You're late on this one.
2. And you had the ****ing nerve to email me about your lost tapes at
Sheffield?
4. You crossposted this all over the place, nice going, Mr. Clean.
3. Does your mother own a gun?
Ty Ford
On Thu, 14 May 2009 10:34:20 -0400, Soundhaspriority wrote
(in article ):
It's this kind of timewasting that has crippled the U.S economy. Hiring
lawyers and litigating the re-use of a review? ********! You've attempted to
strongarm someone for an action that's at best likely "fair use" of your
review, and at worst an innocent mistake that benefits the writer. Any
writer benefits when his work is read and respected.
And the miscreant is an old man with a prestigious audio history far
exceeding that of the mere product reviewer. Sounds mostly like professional
jealousy at work. And publications like Mix actively encourage
manufacturers to reprint their reviews, something that gives more
credibility to the publication as well as encourage advertisers - the method
by which ALL editorial is paid for.
A classic case of "biting the hand that feeds you".
If I was Mr. Lindberg I'd tell Tyreeford to go suck an egg. This is clearly
"fair use" under international copyright law.
Bob Morein
(310) 237-6511
--Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services
Acting and Voiceover Demos
http://www.tyford.com
Guitar player?:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA