Thread: Bi-wiring?
View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
[email protected] dpierce.cartchunk.org@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 334
Default Bi-wiring?

On Mar 5, 6:07*pm, codifus wrote:
On Mar 5, 3:17*pm, "Serge Auckland"
But bi-wiring can't make a difference as the laws
of physics don't allow it.
So, any ideas that different types of music will show up different
capabilities is pure fantasy.


Really? OK. So, every capacitor, inductor, resistor
etc in an electrical circuit behaves perfectly, as
defined by the laws of physics? No, of course not.


Sorry, the most assuredly are.

Capacitors have resistance, inductors have
capicatance and so forth.


All of which are very well understood and work
perfectly fine within the laws of physics. Can you
explain your rather absurd claim they don't?

It goes to follow that circuits built from these
imperfect components won't behave perfectly,
just more or less perfectly.


And EXTREMELY predictably, I would add.

You resort to the laws of physics which is fine
for a textbook case, which this isn't.


Nonsense.

Where on earth do you come up with the absurd notion
that non-ideal components are exempt from the laws of
physics, which is, in essence, what you claim?

In fact, non-ideal components follow physics quite
nicely and, in fact, are QUITE well understood
exactly in the context of physics. The fact that
YOU might not understand this is not a situation
that can be extrapolated to the rest of the world,
fortunately.

Every reasonable physics textbook I've come
across deals quite well with non-ideal components
and their behavior under real-world situations.

Perhaps you need new physics textbooks. Or
maybe you don''t have any.