Exposing Jenn's Middiotic intellectual dishonesty. Again.
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:18:14 -0800, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Jenn" wrote in message
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
In article
, "Arny
Krueger" wrote:
The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find has about
82 dB
dynamic range. Playing it on a player with 92 dB dynamic range only
hurts
the effective dynamic range by a fraction of a dB. And its all
moot,
because if you play the recording at sensible volume levels the
ambient
noise in just about any residential listening room will mask it all.
This is what Jenn, in a fit of Middiocy grotesquely redacted the above
paragraph into:
The very best orchestral recording I've been able to find
(note that in her rush to deceit driven by anger, Jenn does not show that
she edited my post in any way. Academic honesty requires that she add
least an ellipses to show where she cut the text.) Any good teacher who
read the entire paragraph she mangled would ream her strongly for her
horrifically bad editing.)
Oh this is rich. From the man who routinely snips entire sections of posts
when what they contain annoy or refute him....all withou reference of a
"snip" to indicate that it is missing, much less "why" it was snipped.
This is one of Arny's routine practices on this forum and on others....and
he has been called out for it by others beside myself.
I'm trying to discern how he believes I was trying to pull any kind of
fast one on him.
He doesn''t believe that for a second. When cornered, he simply makes
things up. Soon we're all arguing about his lies rather than going
back to the point that he had been wrong all the time.
Herbert
|