[Boon]

On Jan 12, 1:52�pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message







On Jan 12, 1:10?pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message



By the way, from the same review:
"In FLAC, I found it virtually impossible to detect any
difference between the original CDs played on the MS750
and their stored FLAC versions."

John's a lot older than you are, Marc. I wouldn't trust
his ears to pick up everything that a person your age,
whose ears are in good shape could.

This was in the body of the review, which was not written
by John. But thanks for the compliment that I can hear
better than JA. �A smart person, however, would wait for
the results of a hearing test before making that
assumption. Funny how science flies right out the window
whenever you employ the debating trade.

LOL - claiming that Atkinson's sighted listening tests have anything at all
to do with science!

LOL!

The Mac has a number of inherent quality problems, the
IM, the jitter, and the grounding problems. Not fitting
for a high end product ?costing on the order of $6K, not
even particularly good for a $160 DVD player or a PC
with a good audio interface.
This completely ignores the fact that McIntosh has been
offering upgrades to correct some of the initial
problems.

So Marc, you're proud of being a guinea pig for the Japanese?

I didn't know that Binghamton, New York was in Japan.


In fact, the unit I'm using was originally an
MS300 that was just sent back to McIntosh and upgraded
with the latest 750 hard drive and other features. So the
simple truth is that you have no data on how my
particular model measures.

It's not my fault you didn't properly identify the unit they are testing out
on you, Marc.

It's a current model that you would find at any McIntosh retailer in
January 2009. It's not my fault you would use year-old data on newly-
emerging technologies.

Boon