[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On Jan 6, 6:26*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 6, 12:29*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:35*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 5, 5:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jan 5, 5:17 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Jan 5, 1:54 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
...in Minnesota is that Al Franken will be the next US
Senator.

Prove it.

Franken won more votes in a transparent and bipartisan recount.

* We now know your idea of proof is anything you wish for.

Coleman should "step aside" or be labeled a hypocrite. LoL.

*Fair and accurate elections be damned.

This is Minnesota's fairest and most accurate election yet.

*Wow. *You really must have a grudge against the land of
frozen lakes.

You're making stuff up. Don't you hate it when people do that?

*For all I know you made this up.
"This is Minnesota's fairest and most accurate election yet."

Based on the number of votes corrected between voting and certification.

The inconsistent criteria applied in corrections is enough to void
the
whole process....as I expect the court to do if they are willing to
take
the time and do the right thing.

The number of votes in question are too small to affect the outcome.

Stephen