View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,415
Default SNOT for Scottie: Stocking Stuffer

On Dec 27, 10:58*am, ScottW wrote:
On Dec 26, 5:50*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Dec 26, 5:19*pm, ScottW wrote:


On Dec 26, 3:04*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
So to you there can be a supernatural being who can swoop in at will,
part oceans, visit plagues, and so on.


*What is supernatural but that which is not understood?


Um, things that fall outside of natural laws. That's what I'd call
"supernatural". That's what that word means, 2pid.


That's why I personally don't believe that cables with the same RLC
will sound different.


* Sounds like a personal decision on your part.
* Do you lack confidence in your decision?


No, I don't 2pid. I do not have one iota of doubt.

But your argument is that because some people *do* believe that cables
can sound different it is within the "continuum of possibilities". So
your arguments for the necessity of DBTs is fatally flawed.

I chose "bielieve" specifically for this reason, 2pid.

But now you find yourself believing in that
"floobydust" you rail about.


* I prefer to rail about stardust. *Most of the floobydust
railers don't know the difference between floobydust
and dirt.


And yet you're now firmly in their camp. I'm not sure they wanted the
endorsement of a well-known imbecile though.

You cannot have your cake and eat it too, 2pid.
*So the answer is "Yes,
2pid believes that seas can part,


*So you think parting of water is outside the laws of
physics?
You obviously don't know much about physics.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/lo...0/7861/0033419....


So they were able to take a powerful magnet and "part" about 22mm of
water.

Further, since this is a natural phenomenon, gos would have played no
part in it. Moses therefore lied attributing his magnetic smoke-and-
mirrors trick to a diety.

locusts can be controlled by a
supernatural being and Mpingo disks can radically alter the sound of a
stereo".


Modern man and his inventions may well be considered
"supernatural" to ancient man.


Ancient man didn't understand RLC. Lightning was the "anger of the
gods". Likewise earthquakes, as the study of plate techtonics wasn't a
reality. Epilepsy was demons controlling a body.


*Yup. And modern man doesn't yet fully understand superconductivity.
*Does that make it "supernatural"?


Are you claiming it to be?

I'd say that man undertstands conductivity. Man may not understand
conductivity in all environments yet.

So your argument is very flawed.


*The flaw is in your limited intellect.


Oh, ouch!

So let me ask you this, straight up: do you believe the miracles
performed in the bible are accurate historically and reflect actual
events that really happened?

Not being religious doesn't mean that someone hasn't read the bible. I
have, cover to cover.


*I think you should read it again. You clearly missed out on some
very important concepts.


What, that Jesus was an advocate of the downtrodden and did not call
an inability to get healthcare "laziness"?

Another straight-up question, 2pid: Do you believe that you act in a
"good, Christian" manner?