So 2pid...
On 16 Sep, 19:18, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 16, 5:06*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 15 Sep, 23:09, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:57*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 15 Sep, 21:23, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 15, 5:30*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 15 Sep, 16:45, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
...if somebody says "I am an anarchist" are they an enemy of the
Constitution? How about if anarchists are planning a "protest" in a
public library?
Should a declaration or planned "protest" like that be grounds for
imprisonment?
And a military expert like you must *certainly* know that an soldier's
or officer's oath is to the Constitution and *not* the government?
Not true, read what you quoted below
it is to BOTH
No, it isn't. Please show me what you are referring to.
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the
United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me,
according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So
help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the
wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October
1962).
"I will obey the orders of the President of the
United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, "
that is an oath, and its an oath to the government,
Nope.
to obey the orders of the President and officers appointed over you
That 'is' the governmnet.
No, Clyde, as I said that is an oath to follow the orders of the
military chain of command. The President in CinC. And that's the
enlisted version of the oath. Look at the officer's version. Do you
see anything missing? (Hint: it's what you just quoted.)
Don't believe me? Don't believe the quotes I provided in the other
post? Look it up then. You're wrong and you're chasing your tail.
You've hung around 2pid too long. LoL.- Ascunde citatul -
I going th have to repeat this numerous time before you get it.
The government is legally constituted by the Constitution, and derives
its powers
through the Constitution. I you have no allegiance to
the legally constituted government, you therefore do
not have allegiance to the Constitution, you
are just thumbiing your nose at it.
That is not a valid argument. Look at it this way to understand why:
"If A, then B"
"Not B, therefore not A"
This is a totally and conclusively invalid form of argument. Go study
"Logic 101" to understand why.-
Your only argument is that you believe our
'government is Unconstitutional.
You must believe that either the
President, COngress and/or
the Supreme Court lack legitimacy.
|