View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
MiNe 109 MiNe 109 is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,597
Default OT: How about fatuous Suck-upping?

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On Aug 29, 12:40*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Aug 29, 1:00*pm, ScottW wrote:
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=163693


" I'm actually putting a little edge on my criticism just to make up
for the fact that on MSNBC last night somebody said, quote, "it wasn't
a speech: it was a symphony." I'm sorry; I won't even name who did it.
I am here to balance that bit of fatuous -- fatuous suck-upping!"


What a biting indictment from one of RAO's most balanced and
insightful 'thinkers'.


LoL.


Agreed.


For Suck-upping, that doesn't hold a candle to the master:

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011183.php

It must be very strange to be President Bush. A man of extraordinary
vision and brilliance approaching to genius, he can't get anyone to
notice. He is like a great painter or musician who is ahead of his time,
and who unveils one masterpiece after another to a reception that, when
not bored, is hostile.


Passing on the substance again I see. Let me fill you in.


Nope.

The next paragraph was:

"Hyperbolic? Well, maybe. But consider Bush's latest master stroke:
the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. The
pact includes the U.S., Japan, Australia, China, India and South
Korea; these six countries account for most of the world's carbon
emissions. The treaty is, in essence, a technology transfer agreement.
The U.S., Japan and Australia will share advanced pollution control
technology, and the pact's members will contribute to a fund that will
help implement the technologies. The details are still sketchy and
more countries may be admitted to the group later on. The pact's
stated goal is to cut production of "greenhouse gases" in half by the
end of the century."

Just in cased you missed it and if you believe in AGW,
you should be celebrating this accomplishment.
Instead you choose to prove Hinderacker's point.


No, it's still crap.

I believe Obama said repeatedly, you need to be changed.


Looking forward to his election.

Stephen