[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Aug 3, 6:11*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 3 Aug, 18:34, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Aug 3, 3:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

I also don't know if F-22's are better or worse than F-16's
there are probably other things in military affiars I don't know.
I will identify them as I become aware of them

I wasn't aware there were "girl" F-22s and "guy" F-22s, or "gay"
F-22s. Likewise the F-16 or any other aircraft.

Even if there are aircraft sexes and sexual orientations, I don't see
what "problem" that could possibly have on their flight
characteristics or weapons delivery systems.

like I say, I am no expert on military affairs.

And obviously you are also incapable of rational thought as well. You
cannot even come up with one single reason to disallow gay service
that isn't based on bias.

What opinions do you have that you feel are valid? Why do you insist
on the chicken**** way out on all matters pertaining to gays, with the
sole exception of gay marriage?

Things that make you go "Hmmmm".