Buzzard poop
On 3 Aug, 18:34, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Aug 3, 3:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 3 Aug, 15:49, George M. Middius wrote:
I'm not saying Sacky is as dumb as Scottie, but I can give you a perfect of
example of his journeys into the uncharted "middle" zone. Remember when
Sacky recently stated his weasely "opinion" about Gays serving in the
military? He kept saying he "doesn't know" if that would create a "problem".
We, as rational people, know the "problem" is the prejudices of bigots and
homophobes. But Sacky refused to admit he was implicitly embracing that
obvious fact. Instead, he said "I don't know" over and over. Sacky's
"middle" ground is the coward's turf: He claims to abhor the viewpoint he
implicitly embraces.
I also don't know if F-22's are better or worse than F-16's
there are probably other things in military affiars I don't know.
I will identify them as I become aware of them
I wasn't aware there were "girl" F-22s and "guy" F-22s, or "gay"
F-22s. Likewise the F-16 or any other aircraft.
Even if there are aircraft sexes and sexual orientations, I don't see
what "problem" that could possibly have on their flight
characteristics or weapons delivery systems.
like I say, I am no expert on military affairs.
|