[Clyde Slick]

On 31 Iul, 18:28, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jul 31, 4:43*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:





On 31 Iul, 16:06, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 30, 10:32*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 30 Iul, 01:49, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 29, 1:59*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 29 Iul, 14:34, George M. Middius wrote:

Another crooked Republican got indicted today. Ted Stevens, senior Senator
from Alaska, has been taking bribes and, apparently, not hiding the dirty
money very well.



With all those bribes, he can't afford a freezer?

The freezer was confiscated in Cunningham's boat.

republicans 147, Dems 1.

Jefferson must have sold it to him

Perhaps.

I would say (as I did above) that there are obviously some Dems that
have broken rules. The evidence is clear that far more republicans
have. Does this mean that the Dems who broke rules are "better" than
the republicans who did?

Well, maybe they are just better at
not getting caught.But that's a good thing, because
it indicates competency.

You may be on to the next conservative propaganda campign:

"Well, there are actually *more* Democrats who are corrupt. We just
aren't as good at it, hence we get caught more often!"

In a year or two that will be the Gospel according to 2pid.-

Hmmm, do I want competent crooks or incompetent crooks
running the country?