[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 21, 4:10*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*"Arny Krueger" wrote:





"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

On Jul 21, 3:25 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in

m

On Jul 21, 5:49 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in

.com

On Jul 20, 5:59 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"BretLudwig" wrote in message

news:aea6b87fe019f72e746d81e8812abd88@localh ost.talkaboutaudio.com

What, you support letting open gays serve in the
military, or you are an openly gay currently serving
in the military?

Note that ****R won't take responsibility for writing
something that is obviously vague. He's been screwing
up like crazy lately, and far be it from him to admit
even a less-than-clear wording.

Oh, I AM SO SORRY FOR WRITING SOMETHING THAT YOU AND
BRATZI MISINTERPERETED!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF MY WRITING WAS LESS-THAN-CLEAR TO YOU PLEASE
FORGIVE ME!!!!!!!!!

As usual ****R you've missed the point - probably
intentionally. Less-than
clear is excusable, posting something that was
less-than-clear and then
calling people insane when they point that out is sign
of a pathology.

Did you notice that you and Bratzi were the only two who
weren't able to make that leap?

Just goes to show how little you understand about logic
and evidence, ****R. "Absence of evidence is not
evidence of absence".

IOW just because we noticed your badly formed post,
doesn't mean we were the
only ones. We were the only ones with time to waste in
yet another futile
effort to get an intelligent response out of you ****R.

Let's see: Bratzi asked. You jumped to a conclusion that
the post
meant that I had not retired. That would indicate that I
had served,
but lied for some reason about retiring. Now you jump to
the
conclusion that I never served.

So what will your insane mind (or the voices in your
head) tell you
next? LOL!

At least Bratzi asked. You did not.
That's because
you are, in fact, insane. LOL!

It is kinda insane to expect you act like a mature
adult, ****R.

Whatever, GOIA. To bring this back to the point: I will
not give you
any personal information no matter how hard you apply
your "dsebating
trade" techniques, no matter how much you wheedle, beg,
distort, plead
or question.

As long as we're clear on that, by all means proceed.

I rest my case. ;-)

You have no case ****R, except maybe a case of some kind
of brain disease.
Untreated syph, or some such. :-(

Didn't you just accuse me of doing this same thing?

When I do it, it is justified by the fact that I'm a real person, while you
are nobody real.

Imaginary people have no rights at all, right?

This is of interest to me, Arny. *In what way is he an "imaginary
person"? *Is it because he doesn't reveal his name? *Does that make, say
"ScottW" an imaginary person as well?

When somebody cannot attack the logic of an argument, all they can do
is attack the person making the argument.

GOIA believes that he can goad me into throwing up my hands and
crying, "No mas! You're "ripping my torso apart"! Here is my SSN, home
address, name, CV, and nine personal references!"

That will not happen, but it appears that's what he believes.

LOL!