View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger Arny Krueger is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,262
Default 75% support gays openly serving in the military

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message

On Jul 20, 5:59 am, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"BretLudwig" wrote in message

lkaboutaudio.com

What, you support letting open gays serve in the
military, or you are an openly gay currently serving in
the military?


Note that ****R won't take responsibility for writing
something that is obviously vague. He's been screwing up
like crazy lately, and far be it from him to admit even
a less-than-clear wording.


Oh, I AM SO SORRY FOR WRITING SOMETHING THAT YOU AND
BRATZI MISINTERPERETED!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF MY WRITING WAS LESS-THAN-CLEAR TO YOU PLEASE FORGIVE
ME!!!!!!!!!


As usual ****R you've missed the point - probably intentionally. Less-than
clear is excusable, posting something that was less-than-clear and then
calling people insane when they point that out is sign of a pathology.

Not sure how to interpret that. If the
latter, I will give you this: you have guts if not the
best judgment to post this, even under pseudonym!


Nahh, ****R posts under a nym because sockpuppets have
no legal names. They also have no SSNs.


LOL!


Irrelevant.

Unlike the guy whose hand is up the butt of the ****R
sockpuppet, I did serve in the Army. Obviously there
were gays in the Army way back then, but as long as they
did their job and kept their noses clean, where's the
beef?


Juvenile attempt at reverse-psychology noted. You think
you can goad me into giving you any personal information.


Paranoid response noted. It takes a seriously disturbed person to interpret
a statement about gays in the military into an attempt to trick someone into
posting personal information. BTW, when did posting your legal name
constitute releasing sensitive personal information?

Sorry, my lord and master, it will not happen. Why not? Because as I've
said many times, I will not give it to you. LOL!


****R I'm quite sure you won't provide non-sensitive information like you
name because you fear being held accountable for your egregious behavior on
RAO. Also, being a sockpuppet, you have no personal information of any kind,
because you aren't a person. You're just a nym with a huge mouth and ego.

If you did a standard hitch, you were no higher than a
specialist when you got out.


Sue me for not take the OCS bait when it was offered.

You, like 2pid, were not officer material.


At the time I would have done as good of a job of dying in Vietnam, as many
fine officers did. Of course, you don't know anything about the average
lifetime of a Lieutenant in a LZ, do you?