"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
On 11 Iul, 06:40, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in
messagenews:38dd74lc1p1cb0it4kva4h7jir5k5hbtp3@4ax .com
The Krooborg is wallowing in bliss after being
humiliated by Mistress Jenn. He's so elated that he
sent out e-cards to all the other milquetoasts in his
club. Here's the picture he used to commemorate the
splendiferous event:
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/g...dominatrix.jpg
One wonders what makes an alleged adult make an idiotic,
childish post like this.
It is callled humor.
Right, and it would be highly immature humor for even junior high school
kids.
Apparently that is an alien concept to you.
No, the issue is whether the perps of this spew have any concept of adult
behavior. The jury rendered their verdict about 10 years back and left this
place. For some odd reason, you idiots battle on.
Humour is the tendency of particular images, stories or
situations to provoke laughter and provide amusement.
Right, but humor works best when it is appropriate to its target audience.
Aside from the brain-dead and emotionally-challenged regulars like the
Middiot and ****R, most people happening across a Usenet Audio group like
this purports to be would hope to find humor with a more relevant target
audience.
We laugh at something that points out another's errors,
lack of intelligence, or unfortunate circumstances;
granting a sense of superiority.
Exactly why I post here - entertain myself with lack of intelligence on the
scale of say a Jennifer, which is actually funny, though her naiveté and
self-centered bias is pretty sad for a middle-aged woman. Yeah, but it comes
with her state in life.
But what you guys do is so childish as to be more than a little disturbing.
I suspect that if she had any guts or personal integrity, she'd speak out
about it.
Some claim that humour cannot or should not be explained.
Some people will say the darndest things. That doesn't make them true or
relevant. However, again it takes a certain amount of mental ability to
figure that out, or at least believe it if one must read to learn it.
Author E. B. White
once said that "Humor can be dissected as a frog can, but
the thing dies in the process and the innards are
discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind."
We're not talking about dissecting humor, we're talking about noticing the
difference between the preferred humor of 5 year olds, versus humor with
adult appeal. I work with teenagers quite a bit, and all of the ones I
know would be grossed-out with the childishness of this thread's OP and the
initial round of responses.
And that Art is what killed RAO and keeps it dead - the odd mixture of
childishness (meant in a bad way) and grotesque behavior such as your
obsession with the circumstances surrounding my son's death.
You're still fighting that battle, hoping to extract some pain by whatever
desperate means jump into your jumbled mind.
Very sad. And why? Oh, you don't have a life. One forgets ugly facts like
that, for a purpose. It's painful to even contemplate.