[MiNe 109]

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On Jul 10, 3:32*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On Jul 10, 2:21*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jul 10, 4:34*am, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article
,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:41*pm, MiNe 109 * wrote:
In article

m,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:27*pm, MiNe 109 *
wrote:
In article

ps.c
om,

*ScottW wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:32*pm, MiNe 109 *

wrote:
In article ,

*"ScottW" wrote:
Ok, John can go out to Afghanistan with his warrants.
After they slit his throat, hang his corpse and burn
him
*we'll send Joe.
Applying civilian law to terrorists and illegal
combatants is
nuts.

I called you on this kind of blood-thirsty fantasy some
time
back.

*I guess you haven't been following the war very close.
It started out in earnest with the throats of
stewardesses.
You can deny the brutality of the enemy at your
peril, not mine.

I don't fantasize about people I'm arguing with being
killed.

No bus jokes for you. George must be very disappointed.

An opportunity to take the high ground.

* George is missing an opportunity?
*Who knew?

Is it better to play stupid or be stupid?

*I don't think you will pass on either opportunity.

IKYABWAI.

Is it better to be known or leave doubt?

Mild props for a possible allusion, but you're chasing your tail again.





*And one
doesn't need follow the war "very close" to know your view
of
civilian
remedies is mistaken.

How'd the military effort in Afghanistan work out?

So far so good. *You'd prefer the Taliban were still in
charge?

Not so good. I guess you haven't been keeping up with the news.

* The media seems to have moved their negative light from
Iraq to Afghanistan. * But reality is the Taliban are routed
wherever they are opposed.
Now if all our nato "allies" would join the fight, more
rapid progress could be made.

Ah, it's the media's fault.

*For your negative perception.

My negative perception was formed from non-traditional media.

*And after five years, rapid progress is no
longer an option.

* Obama's plan to invade Pakistan may speed things up
a bit.

Still harping on that? He doesn't have one.

*He doesn't have a plan? *How can that be?

Obama without a plan is just Bush III.

No plan to invade Pakistan.

Really?

Really.

But he said, "There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who
murdered 3,000 Americans," he said. "They are plotting to strike
again. . . . If we have actionable intelligence about high-value
terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...AR200708010123
3.html

So given that any actionable intelligence has a rather short shelf
life, don't you think if he plans to invade when he gets some
actionable intelligence he should have some sort of plan now?
Or is he really that ill-prepared to carry out his campaign promises?

Act does not equal invade. Please cease repeating this canard.

Since you clearly don't like being talked
down to, why do you invite it?

I like to see you fail.

You do seem constantly disappointed.

Stephen