[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On Jun 30, 2:02 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:





On 30 Iun, 15:39, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

This is exactly what is wrong about our political climate. Clark
didn't
day anything that needed an apology. Clark should stand by it
because
he's right, and Obamba's camp shouldn't reject Clark's comments.

Why do say he's right? I thought McCain is offering his experience
in
the
Senate as his primary qualification. Did I miss something?

Clark was right. He didn't show disrespect toward McCain's military
experience. He simply said that being a fighter pilot and being shot
down isn't a qualification for the Presidency. He's right.

But there's a little bit of Arny's
snot factor attached to that.

Not really. The McCain advocate said, while arguing qualifications,

Who declares Bob Schieffer a McCain advocate?

GMAFB.

ScottW

He was advocating for McCain.

Lol. So a media person demonstrating the folly
of some political advocates position is
now an advocate of the opposition.
Exactly what did he say that advocated McCain?
Please be specific.

And let me just point out that Obama is now also a McCain
advocate since he too rejected Clarks comments.

ScottW

I was mistaken. Schieffer was the host, not the opposing talking head.

SCHIEFFER: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those
experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot
down. I mean --
CLARK: Well, I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot
down is a qualification to be president.
SCHIEFFER: Really?