Possible audio question
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
On 12 Iun, 07:28, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
On 12 Iun, 06:43, Art's Master and Commander"Arny
Krueger" wrote the following, which
was obviously way over his head:
. Elaborate micing
"Rediculous (sic)"!
Cheap mics sound better.
(in better rooms with better musicians)
Ridiculous generalization
How so, Art?
You don't have much respect for musicians, do you?
You said "cheap mics sound better"
And it obviously confused you, Art.
You lashed out as if I had I said:
"Cheap mics sound better than expensive mics."
For the record, I neither own nor have I directed anybody to buy cheap
microphones. The last 4 microphones that I bought had a list price of $499.
Most of the microphones I use are mid-priced microphones costing $100's. A
few are very inexpensive microphones for whom the next logical upgrade would
be microphones costing $500 or more.
If you had an ounce of sense and intrapersonal skill Art, you'd ask for a
clarification instead of flying off the handle as you habitually do. You're
so deep into ridicule that you are impossible to have around and carry on a
decent conversation.
in the context of recording good musicians
Meaning, that recording good musicians often makes cheap mics sound better.
Furthermore, some very good vocalists seem to have a talent for getting the
best out of whatever mic you put in their hands.
The assumption of a normal person like
me would be that the statement would be
an assertion that they sound better than expensive ones.
You're not the standard of a normal person Art, as any reasonable person who
has read your vast spew of childish and mean posts can tell.
I neither said nor implied ANYTING(sic) AT ALL about musicians.
As you admit Art, the context was good musicians, and you didn't apply it
properly.
|