Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-)
On May 10, 3:31 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 10, 12:09 pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 9, 5:03 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 9 Mai, 16:37, ScottW wrote:
Not at all. If some biased reviewer expects me to believe
his BS pontifications and pay him for it,
he's gotta provide some proof.
No he does not.
Try to read what I wrote. and if he wants me to pay him for it,
he does.
Then buy "S'phile" and force him to do DBTs. Otherwise, you
aren't paying him.
The irony is that Stereophile has occasionally done SBTs
and DBTs and personally I have taken part in more than
100 since my first in the spring of 1977. My rejection of them
as a general reviewing tool is based on that considerable
experience. Remind me again how many blind tests ScottW
has taken part in?
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
|