[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 10, 12:53*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 10, 10:32*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 10 Mai, 13:05, ScottW wrote:

On May 9, 3:10*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On May 9, 3:37*pm, ScottW wrote:

On May 8, 2:53*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 8 Mai, 16:01, ScottW wrote:

*I don't. *I wouldn't have the least bit of interest in a DBT with
you as subject. *You remain thoroughly and hopelessly
confused.

Let's expand on that truth.
You fianlly seem to understand that DBT's with anyone
else but you are completely useless.

*Not at all. *If some biased reviewer expects me to believe
his BS pontifications and pay him for it,
he's gotta provide some proof.

My guess is that the reviewer cares about whether or not you believe
it about as much as as any of us care about whatever your latest jihad
is about.

Which is to say "not at all".

*Which is why they attract just a few 10's of thousands
of paid subscribers in a market of hundreds of millions.
S'phile has very little respect in many of the audio forums
that I've read.

the market for high end audio is hardly in the hundreds of millions..
I guess you re including all adults in the US
btw,

*At least all housholds. *Where does one draw the line
between "high end" and the rest of the audio
market? * I recall the first time I heard a walkman.
It was quite good at the time. Was it "highend".

No.

Every houshold I know has quite a few audio
playback systems. How many households
are "high end" potential markets is totally dependent on what is
"high end".

No.

There is a magazine for people who like bug cuisine.
Do you consider that market in the hundreds of millions?

Is the market potental everyone who eats?

No.

Can marketing
overcome the social stigma of eating bugs?
How about bugs as basic source of protein
like soy?

Yap yap yap.

Why isn't that magazine competing with Time and Newsweek?

I'm sure they'd like to have Time and Newsweek
ad rates.

That wasn't the question now, was it?

Yap yap yap.