[Clyde Slick]

On 10 Mai, 14:06, ScottW wrote:
On May 10, 10:35*am, Clyde Slick wrote:





On 10 Mai, 13:09, ScottW wrote:

On May 9, 5:03*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 9 Mai, 16:37, ScottW wrote:

*Not at all. *If some biased reviewer expects me to believe
his BS pontifications and pay him for it,
he's gotta provide some proof.

No he does not.

*Try to read what I wrote.
*and if he wants me to pay him for it, he does.

Subscribe to an alternate magazine that does.
Oops! there aren't any.
Start your own, after all you just claimed there is a market of
hundreds of millions
of potential subscribers.

*Strawmen.
Bottom line is Atkinson and S'phile have a niche
of gullible subscribers that advertisers will pay to
reach. *I don't have to like it and I think it's
generally bad for the hobby.


I think its good, even the ads have some information.
"At least" you know what's out there.
Use your own common sense when reading it, and you'll be ok.