Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-)
On May 10, 12:05*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 9, 3:10*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On May 9, 3:37*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 8, 2:53*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 8 Mai, 16:01, ScottW wrote:
*I don't. *I wouldn't have the least bit of interest in a DBT with
you as subject. *You remain thoroughly and hopelessly
confused.
Let's expand on that truth.
You fianlly seem to understand that DBT's with anyone
else but you are completely useless.
*Not at all. *If some biased reviewer expects me to believe
his BS pontifications and pay him for it,
he's gotta provide some proof.
My guess is that the reviewer cares about whether or not you believe
it about as much as as any of us care about whatever your latest jihad
is about.
Which is to say "not at all".
*Which is why they attract just a few 10's of thousands
of paid subscribers in a market of hundreds of millions.
S'phile has very little respect in many of the audio forums
that I've read.
Then your option is to not buy it.
Huffing and puffing about reviewers doing DBTs when you will not
perform one yourself is a bit silly, yes?
LOL!
|