|
|
|
|
ProTools for broadcast production Sucks..
(mike e) wrote in
om:
Cool Edit Pro is, I believe, the de-facto audio app for ClearChannel,
so apparently it is good for broadcast.
Also, if you hate all audio apps, why this (insert right word here)
at ProTools? Are you just being controversial?
Sonar and Cubase just confuse me.
Regards,
Mark
For those of you that can't seem to grasp the idea I'm trying to get
across,
tecnnology ideally makes things simpler.
I understand many of you probably haven't been around long enough to
remember an analog environment, but there's absolutely no reason why a
digital soundware applicatgion. can't be designed to be even easier,
to use than an analog studio environment.
You also cut the first half of my post out where I said ProTools is
extremely simple and as someone whose familiar with analog gear I find it
really intuitive to use.
The damn channel strip looks like a channel strip and the signal flow is
blatently obvious. If you ignore the wave form view, PT has a very analog
feel to it. I'm having a hard time figuring out what part of PT you *don't*
get.
I also don't think analog is necessarily easier than digital, though it's
certainly had many more years to be refined, and the engineers that worked
on it probably were more familar with the end application than the software
engineers that write computer programs. There's also the fact that there's
a sort of 1:1 ratio between things - cutting tape is cutting tape, turning
a knob is turning a knob that you always lose a little of when going to
digital.
I honestly find ProTools very easy to use and very analog-head friendly.
Regards,
Mark
--
http://www.marktaw.com/
http://www.prosoundreview.com/
User reviews of pro audio gear
|