[Arny Krueger]

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
t
Arny Krueger wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote
Arny Krueger wrote:
Jenn wrote



All of us have swapped gear in our systems over the
years. Other than room treatment or other space
improvements, what piece of gear changed the sound of
your system for the better to the largest degree?


Rane equalizer.


It is a MQ 302S.

Most likely due to collection of poorly recorded music
and sound along with, without a doubt, aggravation from
an unsuitable listening environment having unwavering
and uncorrectable room acoustic.

Just wild speculation on your part, Borglet. I couldn't
be using the equalizer to obtain improved levels of
performance in a situation that most would find to be
good enough, now could I?

Well yes,

Thank you.

but you admitted below that the reasons you
desire to obtain improved performance using equalizer was
decided upon after you rearranged, redecorated, and rearranged your
room many times.

What's wrong with that?


Why would you imply that your situation
would be good enough for most when, in fact, you have to
drastically rearranged your room and still, utilize
equalizer to improved your situation.

Every approach has its limits. The more relevant approaches you apply to the
difficult proposition of properly reproducing music, the better the results,
no?

Exactly, how would most people find your situation good
enough ?

Obviously, it sounded good enough for most people, even picky people.

After treating the room and rearranging the space, have
you tried other things before that ?

A sentence that is absolute nonsense due to a looped
time line. I'm going to do some speculative decoding
with it and take a wild guess at its meaning. I think
you are asking whether I tried other things before
treating the room and rearranging it. [...]

I said, have you tried other things AFTER treating the
room and space.

What you said before that made the whole run-on into a big train wreck.


The answer is that the
room has been rearranged, redecorated, and rearranged
many times. he speakers and electronics have gone
through several generations of changes.

So yes, you arrange and rearrange your room and failing
that --

No, having obtained some but not yet enough success to satisfy me...

you decided to utilize an equalizer.to ameliorate your
poor listening environment.

Why would it necessarily be poor?

OR, did you wished to incorporate Rane equalizer into
your system firsthand and then, decided to rearrange the
hell out of your room in order to easily equalize your equalizer ?

No, the Rane is a fairly recent addition, but not the first equalizer to be
used in that system.

What would be your advice to clients.

Fix room acoustics first, equalize as needed to address
issues with music sources, equipment, and finally the
room.

Was you intention to use Rane equalizer to compensate for your poorly
designed listening environment or, to address
issues you have with your poorly recorded music sources ?

Who says that either is the reason why I added the Rane?