On Feb 16, 3:18*pm, wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am a new member to this group.I have been intensely searching for
opinions regarding bi amping,since i was to do one myself.If I am
right,usual bi amping involves passive bi amping only and the results
are much limited improvement in sound.Active bi amping with active
cross overs is the true bi amping business,but tricky and risky.
(Please correct me,if i am wrong).I just tried my old Graphic
equalizer (Marantz CD PLAYER to NAD Preamp to Technics G.Equalizer ...
12 times 2 = 24 Band., to Rotel power amp 200w /channel to Wharfedale
Evo 8 ..150w rms.There seems improvement in sound in general.Moreover
you can adjust the more specific frequencies if you wish so and no
confusion in connections etc.Is not this a better and scientific
method.Can you please comment on this and point out the flaws if there
are any.
This site may be helpful to you in answering some of your questions:
http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm