Thread
:
tweaks and proof
View Single Post
#
81
Bromo
Posts: n/a
tweaks and proof
It is all in the digital receiver - and the amount of allowable timing
errors before it turns into audible errors. The higher the "oversampling"
or "sampling" rate, the better the clock recovery has to be - and the less
room for error.
In a digitized telephone network the allowable timing errors and dispersion
allowed is helped with the limited bandwidth, and the recovery circuits are
quite good.
On 6/20/04 10:30 AM, in article
, "Chelvam"
wrote:
IF you got through other posts here, especailly the one on Vintage DAC-
jitter is a higher in separate DAC.
___
"Rich.Andrews" wrote in message
news
a7Bc.72457$eu.43358@attbi_s02...
How is jitter reintroduced with a short cable yet digitized telephone
signals travel over miles of copper without impact?
IOW, that site could be deconstructed quite easily, but isn't worth the
time, bandwidth, nor the effort.
r
--
Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes.
Reply With Quote