View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,415
Default 2pid gives an 'English' lesson (Part 2)

On Jan 18, 3:22*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jan 17, 2:19*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"


wrote:
On Jan 16, 5:22*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
On Jan 16, 5:02*pm, ScottW wrote:


On Jan 16, 12:36*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"


wrote:
On Jan 16, 2:33*pm, ScottW wrote:


A real indicator of your integrity or actually the lack thereof.


So let me get this straight:


*Sorry, this isn't straight...not even close.


I re-responded to an earlier post, dum-dum. In it, you'll find no
inference, no implication, no twisting or anything else. You'll find
the exact quote. Jeebus, this is deliciously rich. I think I'll post
it again he


Jenn
"Of course not. *But it is de rigueur for you to complain about
something
concerning me."


(I'd better emphasize the place where the OP said "for you" so that
2pid can see I'm telling the turth. I'd sure hate to have a 'moral'
being like 2pid question my integrity!) ;-)


"Of course not. *But it is de rigueur ***for you*** ***for you***
***for you*** to complain about something
concerning me." LOL!


Me


She said "for you" 2pid.


2pid
*" " usually indicate ...well a quote. *Not words inferred.
But that is your form of discussion...what is said isn't, what isn't
said is etc.
A real indicator of your integrity or actually the lack thereof.


*It's really quite bizarre how hard you strive to
twist. *Oh well...it's your integrity.


Indeed, 2pid. It certainly is my integrity. Thank god it's not your
integrity I have. And just look at the "twisted" and "inferred"
statement of "for you" in the original quote. You know, the one where
" " usually means there's a quote?


What an imbecile. Christ on a crutch but you're stupid. LOL!


You obviously have no need of it.


Chalk up "integrity" to the long, long list of words that 2pid has no
comprehension of.


So as I said, 2pid: you are of the opinion that those who understand
what is said are "twisting" and lack "integrity". I find that very
interesting.


What, 2pid? No apology? No comment at all?


This speaks volumes about your 'integrity'.


lol Lol LoL lOl loL LOL!


Uh-oh. 2pid hasn't shown up to respond. He's following his avoidance
MO now.

He's probably off licking his 'wounds' somewhere. ;-)


I'm confidant that 2pid will slink back into RAO at some point.
Perhaps he has a tail between his legs right now.

I do want to make sure that the lesson we all learned from him isn't
lost. ;-)