Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|
SM57 capsule or workalike
In article ,
(Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Peter Larsen wrote:
That actually is what he wrote prior to translating it to english ... not
worth bothering about, just use it as is. But why not simply skip that
transformer, surely he will have output voltage enough if he mounts the mic
inside the cabinet or just in front of the loudspeaker! - surely it
transforms up???
If you do that, it changes the loading on the capsule and the frequency
response changes dramatically. In the eighties it was a very popular
thing to do, and a lot of studios would have a few specially-marked
SM-57s with the transformer removed.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Scott,
Have you a-b'ed a made-in-Mexico 57 with the USA made model it replaced?
Am curious if you've heard or seen any differences.
I have an old school engineer client that prefers earlier USA 57's with
the different writing on them, think they are pre 1983 or so. Says they
are the best ones.
I own a bunch of 57's, but there is one that is my fave, and it's from
1987. It's also the newest one I own.
David Correia
www.Celebrationsound.com
|