O Boy, a spam attack
In article
,
ScottW wrote:
On Jan 16, 12:04*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 16, 11:13*am, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 16, 10:11*am, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:45*pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article ,
*"ScottW" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
ews.
prod
igy.
net
...
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in
message
news:jennconductsREMOVETHIS-F07213.17092915012008@newsclstr0
2.ne
ws.p
rodi
gy.
com
...
"Joy". *Perhaps if Huckabee gets his way, God will
prevent
this
kind
of
thing from happening. *eg
Is this your contribution? *Not particularly interesting
as
spam goes.
ScottW
Yes, Scott, this is my contribution. *And the above is your
"interesting" response. *Thanks for it.
Your welcome. *In the future I look forward to a better
effort
from you.
Something that might be worth discussing rather than just
complaining there is nothing of interest for you today.
ScottW
That isn't what I was doing. *The group (as well as others I
read)
was
hit was dozens of spam posts.
*Not on google or cox.
Well, bully.
* Again, anything more interesting on your
mind today?
Everything on my mind today is more interesting than your exchanges
with
Shhhh.
*I won't argue with that. * Still nothing worth sharing apparently.
ScottW
Nothing that would be of interest to anyone here; just a much
anticipated trip to the NAMM show Friday and Saturday.
What NAMM member company are you affiliated with?
ScottW
Martin Guitars, B-Band pickups, Hal Leonard publishing.
I've got a bunch of Hal Leonard guitar lesson stuff.....
didn't work.
ScottW
For it to work, YOU must work ;-)
I don't do any HL guitar work. I do things in the classical division,
editing, proofreading, etc.
|