[[email protected]]

On Jan 16, 11:25*am, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





*ScottW wrote:
On Jan 16, 10:55*am, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Jan 16, 12:11*pm, Jenn wrote:

Everything on my mind today is more interesting than your exchanges with
Shhhh.

How's that for gratitude?

We're busy 'saving' RAO.

lol *I don't mind your exchanges with Scott, I just don't find them to
be terribly interesting, just as I'm sure others don't find my
conversations with Arny to be very interesting. *Nor do I mind Scott's
off-topic posts. *I just find it "interesting" that he feels the need

Now now...that is so Arny like to put needs where there aren't.

Your needs are shown by your predictable behavior.



Your sensitivity to even minor criticism is quite high.
Why is that?

No, it's not. *I gladly accept criticism every day. *I perform publicly
a great deal. *Criticism comes with the territory and listening to it
with a good spirit is one way one improves. *What is find interesting is
when someone goes out of their way to be critical of another, of even
trivial things.





Your post reminds me of the occasional corp e-mail outbursts of
people who want to remind everyone....to not reply all to
corp. wide e-mails. * Sometimes they have multiple echoes.

ScottW- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

May I suggest in all kindness that you do not continue one of these
pointless RAO exchanges with the RAO frequent users? I'm saying this
out of respect for your calling. You deserve better.
Ludovic Mirabel