A couple of days ago, our resident imbecile, 2pid, posted this link:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019465.php
He chose to excerpt this portion:
LTC Joseph C. Myers, Army Advisor to the Air Command and Staff
College, speaks out about the firing of Stephen Coughlin:
"We began on September 12, 2001 with "Islam is a religion of peace,"
which soothed ideological sentiments of many but has failed us
strategically, short-stopped the objective, sytstemic evaluation of
the threat doctrine.
"Islam is a religion of peace" is fine for public policy statements,
but is not and cannot be the point of departure for competent
military
or intelligence analysis...it is in fact a logical flaw under any
professional research methodology...you have stated the conclusion
before you have done the analysis.
If one has studied the implication of the Holy Land Foundation trial
discovery documents as I have, as a former DIA senior military
analyst, and understanding as even Bill Gertz has written in his book
Enemies about the dismal record of our counter-intelligence one has
to
wonder and question the extent we are in fact penetrated in
government
and academia by foreign agents of influence, the Muslim Brotherhood,
Islamists and those who truly in essence do not share our social
compact."
I asked 2pid a very straightforward question: "What do you suppose LTC
Myers meant by these remarks?"
Keeping in mind 2pid's very public denouncements of flaming and
insults, here is his response to my question:
"LoL (sic)...I think LTC Myers words are too close to home for our
resident islamist apologist."
Rather than answer a question about a post he made, 2pid has
immediately resorted to the insults that he claims to detest.
We can see from this latest example that I have been correct all
along: 2pid is far more interested in propaganda and Rovian PR
techniques than he is generating the 'discussions' he 'thinks' are
'saving' RAO. Above all else, 2pid is concerned with furthering his
small-'mind'ed agenda.
I suppose it's too much to expect rationality and honesty from someone
who publicly admits to having oral sex with stray dogs and complains
that their ass is chapped from being licked too often. Perhaps the
mental anguish he suffers from won't allow 2pid to answer questions.
Perhaps he has become gutless as a result of pursuing his strange
sexual fetishes. All we can know for sure is that probably the only
time 2pid has been honest is when he confessed to his odd sexual
obsessions. After all, who would lie about something like that?
I predict a couple of possible outcomes: 2pid will either resort to
answering this post with yet more of the insults he claims to detest
and once again ignore a straightforward question about one of his
posts, or 2pid will simply not answer. These are, of course, the marks
of a true propagandist. 2pid can then be placed alongside Bratzi as
the two most despicable posters on RAO. Either of these will also
reinforce the truth about what 2pid truly is: a cowardly and
hypocritical imbecile.
That would make me right about 2pid. And wouldn't that just chap
2pid's ass?
lol Lol LoL LOL!