[Trevor Wilson[_2_]]

"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 11:30 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,
Bret Ludwig wrote:

On Dec 18, 7:01 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net wrote:
The population of South Africa is greater than the population of
Australia. The whites are outnumbered. This is a call to arms!

Australia is a benighted land full of really poisonous snakes and
spiders and huge crocodiles, but worse, its population is full of
liberal weak mindedness.

Nah, it's the land of one of the most interesting composers of the 20th
century.

Actually there are many remarkable Australian activities and
products. I'm told the best piano in the world today is made there.
But the trend politically there defies any intelligent explanation.

**That makes you a complete idiot. Let me explain why Australians voted the
way they did (Howard, being the ousted, conservative [Republican]PM and
Rudd, being the new, liberal [Democrat] PM):

* Howard aligned himself with the planet's dumbest leader (George W Bush)
and has spend billions of taxpayer Dollars on Dubya's war in Iraq, thus
placing valuable resources and military personel at risk for no good reason.
* Howard has been actively attempting to dismantle two of the nation's most
important health system pillars. These are renowned the world over, for
reducing the cost to patients of drugs and health care, whilst maintaining a
high standard for all Australians. Howard has been attempting to emulate the
US system, where the big winners are large medical corporations.
* The Howard government has been the highest taxing government in Australian
history.
* The Howard government was elected on a platform of promises to keep
interest rates low, but has presided over 6 interest rate rises in the last
couple of years.
* The Howard government has been dogged by allegations of corruption and
nepotism.
* The Howard government has been guilty of squandering hundreds of million
of taxpayer Dollars on political advertising.
* The Howard government has resisted the adoption of a Republican model for
Australia (though the majority of Australias no longer want the Queen of
England as Australia's head of state).
* Howard actively courted religious groups to assist with his campaigns. At
least on of those religious groups employs tactics which are objectionable
and possibly illegal.
* Howard resisted signing the Kyoto Protocol.
* Howard consistently claimed the there was no global warming.
* When presented with irrefutable evidence that global warming was occuring,
Howard then claimed that it was not anthropogenic in nature.
* Howard was perceived (correctly, as it happens) as being completely out of
touch with Australians.

And it's true they've been content to live on the coastline and not
move inland. Australia could easily support five times its present
population.

**You have ZERO idea. None, whatsoever. Every city in Australia (save one)
has tough water restrictions in place. Most of Australia is in the middle of
drought. Not only can we not feed a population much larger than it is at
present, but there is not enough water to drink. Washing cars is a memory
for most city dwellers. There is not enough for that. We live on the coast
for good reason. It's nice. There's adequate water, plenty of trees and
temperatures are more benign.

100 million people would turn Australia into a third world ********.
Australian soils are ancient, fragile and lack fertility. Few crops will
grow in most of the country.

Trevor Wilson