[Clyde Slick]

On 19 Dec, 23:02, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Dec 19, 2:09 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:





On 19 Dec, 20:57, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Dec 19, 3:04 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 19 Dec, 02:11, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

. Freedom is great. Responsible freedom is even better.-

Yaw ho' bitch made you say that.

Don't worry, Clyde. I beat some sense into her.

i would send NOW after you, if they had the integrity to do anything.

Why should they? If what I said was actually true then it would be a
police matter.

Damn. Not one liberal group has integrity. Not a single one. Every
liberal, and every liberal group, is hypocritical. Every single one.
Whatever are we to do?

stop making things up.

I'd recommend staying with those 'moral' republicans. After all, we've
had seven years of 'morality' in the White House, and look at how far
we've come! We can conclude that choosing candidates based on
'integrity' is a sure-fire solution!


you can vote for one with no integrity, if you choose.

You are, of course, correct. To the best of my knowledge, NOW has not
waterboarded anybody. Clearly they do not have the integrity to do
anything. Thank you for pointing that out.- Ascunde citatul -

they don't have the integrity to stand up
for women's rights, if it means ****ing
off other factions of the liberal alliance.