One big question to ask yourself is "how will I monitor myself
while I am recording?" If you are planning to use a mixer for
your preamps and generate a monitor mix for yourself outside
the DAW you can get away with a pretty simple PC. I am still
on a six year old 1.4 Meg P4 and record 24 tracks at once with
nuendo and mixdown in the DAW. No problem.
Once you start getting into the "monitor in the box" the
latency issue pops up and you need more processor power. Most
of the stuff on the Cuebase forum is related to getting a low
latency mix out of the DAW.
I have sat in a room with the Steinberg rep and listened to a
guitar player scrape the strings then after a noticeable delay
I hear the guitar come out of the monitors. Although the
guitar player had no problem with this the bass player could
not play at all with the delay (latency). Of course the rep
denied there was any audible latency at all, even though the
bass player refused to do his part and I was clearly hearing
the delay with the guitar.
IMHO---There is a cavernous difference between what these guys
call "low latency" and what in the analog world is NO LATENCY.
peace
dawg
Ritual wrote in message
news
I am of little resources. I'm about to dump all I can into a
last
hope.
Is there anything I should know about building a computer
for
music-making purposes? Is there a chipset I should avoid?
What should
I build? I have looked all over the web with no definite
info. I would
appreciate experienced people, I do Cubase and VST and
guitar
recording on what little equipment I have (basic mixer,
mics, amp,
axes). I do remember that certain chipsets and so-on were to
be
avoided not too long ago. I need recommendations (with info
to back it
up, if possible) towards building a system.
My local builder, whom I have much faith in, builds good
stuff but is
not specialized in audio. I find it hard to believe that no
particular
audio configuration exists.
- R