[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 20, 12:47 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote

On Nov 19, 11:56 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

if you mean in 2006, the answer is so speculative because
of so many other events that happened, did not happen,
would have happened but didn't, did happen but would not have.

And this counters the point that we've already agreed on, how?

All I said to kick off 2pid's ****storm is that the fall of the former
USSR cannot be attributed directly to reagan, but that he may have
influenced it, which implies that there were other factors involved.

Keep spinning...and where he'll stop, nobody knows.
Not even ssshhhhieeee.

Hm. What an odd response.

Why don't you remind me where I said anything other than that.