[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 19, 10:52 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"MiNe 109" wrote in message

In article
,
ScottW wrote:

On Nov 18, 5:10 pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,

ScottW wrote:
On Nov 18, 3:04 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

No, not at all, 2pid. My point is this: the USSR was going to fail
eventually all on its own.

Yes, a meteor is going to hit the Kremlin eventually.

Why do you think others owe you a fair discussion when this is a typical
response from you?

I make a sarcastic comment on unsubstantiated opinion stated as fact
and you start asserting the "fairness" doctrine.
Is it "unfair" to suggest you need a clue?

Yes, it is. For one thing, although it wasn't "substantiated" in the
very post in which it was expressed, that view is part of the mainstream
in explaining the fall of the Soviet Union and as such an informed
person could be expected to know of it.

One unsubstantiated opinion begets another.

Did you, or did you not, just list several contributing reasons that
the former USSR would have fallen all on its own, which is EXACTLY
what I said (once again, I will not post a message ID, sinces it's IN
THE FIRST LINE OF THIS POST), then give Stephen **** for agreeing (and
don't forget that Clyde did, too)?

You call it "unsubstantiated opinion" or "opinion stated as fact",
help prove that the statement is 100% correct, and then thrash about
with weak insults. My god, man, you must have gotten jealous when I
said that nob was the dumbest poster on RAO. So the race is on! LOL!

All one had to do in your misinformed world is make their view
"mainstream". I guess once upon a time, the earth
was really flat.

It's beginning to appear that the "flat earth" you saw was actually
the top of your head in the mirror.

LOL!

Imbecile.