On Nov 18, 6:59 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Nov 18, 3:04 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Nov 18, 11:44 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ...
On Nov 17, 6:35 pm, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote
On Nov 17, 10:31 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
They're starting on their own, 2pid. We still outdo them in many
areas. Perhaps we should (and I know this is not how your 'mind'
works) take care of business at home before pointing fingers
elsewhe
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/wo...a/26china.html
You always make irrelevant links that actually prove my point.
Do you actually think that the people of China will not do anything
about it? There is already civil unrest over the issue. The government
recognizes there is a problem and they are trying to take steps
(albeit unsucessfully so far, but that will likely change) and the
people certainly do.
Lol...they can't get grip on smog and you expect the chinese
people to accept hardship over CO2?
2pid, you really do need to read some history. Really.
I think discussing this with you is a waste. Why? Because you believe
the fall of the former USSR is a direct result of "The Great
Communicator".
You're not just confused, you're delusional.
No, not at all, 2pid. My point is this: the USSR was going to fail
eventually all on its own.
Yes, a meteor is going to hit the Kremlin eventually.
Iraq would have had political change all on
its own. They did not "need" us for regime change. And the Chinese
will eventually take care of themselves.
Lol... You do have lots of faith.
Perhaps.
Faith and thousands of years of human history are on my side.
But as I said, you believe the former USSR fell as a result of
conservative US politics.;-)