On Nov 12, 3:07 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Nov 12, 12:34 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:07 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Nov 12, 10:11 am, MiNe 109 wrote:
Jenn wrote:
Well, it already happens in most places in CA; the question is the
extent, the quality, what grade it starts, etc.
Read about it he
http://music-for-all.org/sos.html
Of course, y'all could just raise taxes! :-)
Since most of education is funded by property tax
that would be the nail in the coffin of Ca housing
market.
There was a nail in the coffin of California's housing market 10-15
years ago, too.
Not even close to the same scenarios.
Markets ebb and flow. The future always just is. Short-term thinking
always creates long-term problems.
Plattitudes always fail to be meaningful.
Or universal health care will help that shortfall. Leave it to Scott to
bring up health care costs in discussing music education.
I just used that article to point out the rising budget deficit
forecast for '08. As the economy declines further
and housing continues to stall, expect those projections
to rise painfully highlighting the fact that Arnold never fixed
the budget deficit but just borrowed his way to short term
balance.
That sounds very republican of him.
Yeah, lets make him Senator after this.
What do you think?
Jenn's comment, "Well, it already happens in most places in CA"
seems a bit odd for a state with less than 1 in 10 getting any
music education. Given the states performance in math,
english, and reading, music is not likely to see any resurgence
in the cirriculum anytime soon.
Oh goody. More illterate engineers.
Lol...are you an aspiring engineer now?
Point made, x2 because he didn't realize it. No, x3 because he threw
in a lame "IKYABWAI".
I see you have your perceived illiteracy requirement down.
I think the rest of the curriculum is going to give you trouble.
Nobody really cares what you think, 2pid. You post propaganda and then
bail when called on it.
LOL!