In article .com,
ScottW wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:55 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
ScottW wrote:
On Oct 31, 7:45 am, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message
igy.
net
...
In article . com,
ScottW wrote:
On Oct 29, 8:45 pm, Jenn
wrote:
Interesting thoughts music in the digital age. A thumbs up for
the
mention of the San Francisco Symphony/MTT "Keeping Score"
project; a
FANTASTIC thing.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2...fa_fact_ross?p
rin.
..
e=true
Seems to me Atkinson was bitching here about someone posting a
complete
copy of an article.....Considered it a copyright violation.
This doesn't seem like a copyright problem to me, as I posted the
link
to their website, thereby giving attribution. At any rate, had I
not
done so, someone would have been critical of that. So, whatever.
Anyway..."unregulated openness of the Internet seems to have done
it
many favors."
It being classical music.
Giving away recordings inspires interest in performances.
Yes it can. As long as it's the owner's decision, it's a good
thing.
Musicians
should not be greedy.
Most are just trying to make ends meet like everyone else.
20 Million classical musicians trained in social programs might
not help.....
ScottW
Sorry, you'll have to clarify.- Hide quoted text -
That Venezuela social program is going to make classical musicians
cheaper than
berry pickers.....
As if more than a tiny fraction want to or qualify for doing music as a
profession.
What qualifications does it take to qualify for music as a profession?
Using gross revenue as a measure of success?
Sadly the answer is more T as in T & A than talent or training.
I'm sorry, since we were discussing the youth orchestra program in
Venezuela, I thought that we were talking about classical.
Although there is a bit of T&A there as well of late.