Not without compensation I won't
On Oct 23, 10:21 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ooglegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 12:32 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
oglegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 12:20 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
On Oct 23, 12:01 am, "ScottW" wrote:
Life is not fair, 2pid. Not all hate speech is received the same,
apparently.
You mean not everyones right to free speech is respected.
There were two culprits at work he the venue, for not providing
adequate security, and the behavior of the protesters, who also should
not have been allowed to run rampant (see above).
Both have a right to speak.
Not really, the protestors have no right to prevent Gilchrist from
speaking, an invited guest of the University.
That's not what I said. Both do indeed have a right to speak.
The protestors
have no right to equal accomodation by the university as well.
The fault lies with the university's poor security.
They can protest outside the event but they have no right
to disrupt the event.
As I said, security was the actual issue.
The disruptors get a pass....typical.
They can't be accountable for their actions..it was lack
of parental supervision.
So in your twisted lack of self responsibility world
downloader's must also get a pass for lack of security.
There is but one conclusion I can draw here, 2pid: you're an imbecile.
|