Time for a poll
On Oct 23, 10:08 am, "ScottW" wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in ooglegroups.com...
On Oct 23, 12:25 am, "ScottW" wrote:
Now we should have a poll...who prefers off topic discussion to
off topic ridicule?
That's a false question. It implies that the OT discussion is just
naturally there, and that the ridicule is the problem,
Lol...you're such a rookie.
Go back a few years when we had knowledgeable people
who discussed audio...guys like JJ who
were relentlessly branded as Phoebe the telco witch
and tell me again that ridicule follows the OT.
If an audio post is ridiculed, it's actually on-topic, 2pid. Here's an
example:
*********************************************
Anyone see any correlations between the characterizations of Mr. Holt
and opinions posted on rao by the anti-objectivists in recent years?
Sure. The "anti-objectivists" want to advance sound quality.
Why "advance" sound quality when everything already sounds the same?
We've hit the wall: 16-bit CDs, QSC amps and wire from Home Depot.
Audio nirvana, no sound advancement required.
So what are you bitching about?
***********************************************
Do you see the dilemma the original poster created, 2pid? Electronics,
cables, and all sources (except for vinyl/turntables or tape, I
presume, which makes one a "bigot", as we've seen...) are "solved",
yet it is the "anti-objectivists" who are responsible for halting
audio progress, where progress is apparently not needed. What's left
to progress? So I poked fun at the original poster for being too dim
to see the unsolvable dillemma he had created.
Speakers are objectively tested at the factory. There has been
discussion here on blind-testing at Harman, for example. So what ill
have "anti-objectivists" created in the world of audio?
Never mind...devotion to the middiot won't allow a fair
assessment from you.
I use logic, 2pid. If you want to 'discuss' something, how about where
the flaw in my logic is?
when one
clearly follows the other. The question should be, "Who wishes that OT
deluges would go away?"
Anyway, by coming up with this idea, you imply you'd go along with the
outcome. Bratzi, are you in?
So let's poll everybody. Who wishes OT deluges would go away?
I do I do.
I figured as much. I admire your honesty.
That's one "Yes". I'll add mine.
2-0 for "Yes"
You can't even conduct an honest poll.
Honest polls have honest questions, 2pid. Your question was bull****.
You should be thanking me...
You're the Hussein of pollsters.
You've created another dilemma for yourself, 2pid. Not surprisingly,
you are too stupid to see it. LOL!
|