[vlad]

On Sep 20, 9:39 am, Jenn wrote:
In article .com,



vlad wrote:
On Sep 19, 1:10 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article . com,

vlad wrote:
On Sep 19, 11:39 am, Jenn wrote:
In article . com,

ScottW wrote:
On Sep 18, 5:50 pm, Jenn wrote:
Excellent "As We See It" in the new issue, John.

What was so "excellent".....or is usenet now your preferred pesonal
comm path?

ScottW

It's about an "unintentional" blind test and the audibility of
differences in digital files.

I have read this article carefully and found nothing about "
"unintentional" blind test and the audibility of
differences in digital files.". Can you give direct quote with your
comment, Jennifer?

vova

It seems that it's not online yet. Feel free to grab a copy and read
it. I don't have time to type long quotes right now.

So is it September or October issue that you referring to? September
issue is online and I found nothing in it relating to your "opinion".

vova

October.

Just curious: why did you place the word "opinion" in quotation marks?


You said:

" It's about an "unintentional" blind test and the audibility of
differences in digital files."

It was not clear to me if this was a statement of opinion or a fact.
Judging by your refusal to comment on it I take it as another
unfounded opinion of high-ender.

Am I right about it?

Stereophile publishes so much technical gibberish that whatever cover
price is, in my view, it is a vaste of money. Magazine that keeps
Michael Fremer on a payroll is not worth of serious attention. When
this article will be available online I will read it and then we can
continue discussion.

vova