Comments on Sound and Vision Magazine Turntable Cover Story
Dimness becomes you, Harold.
Brother Horace, Galley Slave in the Order of Basement-Dwelling
Dust-Collector Monks, intoned:
I think the owners want [Sound & Vision] to be the National
Enquirer of the home-entertainment journalism business.
If you were a real person, you'd know how silly that analogy is. The
tabloid publication you reference peddles lurid gossip packaged in a
sensationalistic, trailer-trashy sensibility. How on earth does that
niche relate to consumer electronics, nimrod?
You have a habit of what your palborg Krooger calls "selective editing".
I feel obliged to reinstate the parts you ignore just to remind
everybody what a hoser you are.
They should just opt to let it be a good magazine for AV hobby
enthusiasts, and also make a point of doing educational
articles like what we once read in Stereo Review, Audio, and
even sometimes Stereophile.
I see you're still spouting the stillborn platitudes you believe
constitute "wisdom". Have you ever stopped to wonder, Clerkie, why no
publishers seek out your opinion on how to shape and market their
magazines?
Because most of them depend upon readers like you for their
subscription base.
That explains why they've suffered precipitous losses. Do you subscribe
to S&V, Clerkie? How about Stereophile? Got to keep up with the rich
neighbors, you know.
|