another sshhhiiie childish rant
On Jul 16, 4:02 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Jul 16, 1:49 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article .com,
ScottW wrote:
On Jul 16, 1:38 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
wrote:
Looking at and his:
You can't even get out one sentence without
screwing it up.
You don't want to do that, Scott. You really don't. Just a heads-up.
Just exposing his hypocrisy.
2pid, if I counted the number of times I have not addressed not only
you're typos, but your absolute mashing of the English language, mis-
or ill-defined words, and so on, I would be in the thousands.
There's no hypocrisy (a word you still apparently do not understand).
I don't care about typos and
misspellings, I'm more interested in ideas and points of view.
Unfortunately the immature won't allow an unfettered exchange
based upon facts.
Facts are great things. They're even greater things when applied
logically.
Are you aware of how often you end up arguing with yourself?
Look at the recent exchange regarding air strikes in Afghanistan, for
example.
They resort to group stereotypes,
I only lump those who disagree with me into a stereotypical group,
2pid. That's different. LOL!
distortion and lies to attack and denigrate a position.
Then how come you never answer a question that's been asked of you
directly, 2pid?
Last decent exchange worthy of consideration included
Stephens well documented point on suicide bombers.
2pid, Arbitor, Judge, Jury, (and quite simply, the Biggest Intellect
here), speaketh.
Too bad, there could be so many more.
But not with you, 2pid, because you don't understand logic.
Oh well, I'm sure the conversation will pick up
with the new season of 6 ft under....if there is
one.
It will probably me a more intelligent conversation than attempting to
discuss anything with you, 2pid.
|