[JBorg, Jr.[_2_]]

ScottW wrote:
JBorg, Jr. wrote

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL selectors
needs science to determine good audio ?


Did I insist? I think I said it would be beneficial to know how it
compares to their reference system.

So many reviews are just a bunch of mindnumbing adjectives
and the obvious impact of advertiser funded publications
has diminished the entire industries credibility IMO.

ScottW


You are out of order !

Please tell what you mean by saying that no science is like
listening to sticks on hollow logs with ... topless women ?

Please tell why you insist that hifi reviewers and RCL
selectors needs science to determine *good audio* ?

I'm sorry that I have decided to slap your wrist, but only a
little bit though 'cause I know there might still be traces of
rational left inside your self-assured self to exploit. Your
willingness to respond promptly is appreciated. It shows
courage. Accordingly also, you are one high-spirited
poster that knows how to maintain happy marriage. That's
another plus. With regards to OT posting which you are
prone to do, well there's also crochet if you are bored.