[ScottW]

"Soundhaspriority" wrote in message
...

"JBorg, Jr." wrote in message
. ..

ScottW contends that science *decides* good audio. He admitted
that if he was to "sell" his opinion, he will have science on side when
selecting good audio. He exclaimed that hi-fi reviewers and
selectors of RCL add science in their selecting process, that is,
not just based solely on what they think is good audio. Science sell,
I suppose. He extol that *no science* is like listening to sticks on
hollow logs with ... topless women doing the Shakira....

So, no science to him is as good as listening to sticks and logs with
topless women wearing grass skirt swinging and twisting all around.

After a few posting exchanges in hope to understand his mind,
he now have a change of heart, because now he confessed that
good audio to him is simply based on what he likes. If science
were to comes marching down telling him that a particular audio
component(s) sounds good, he'd be simply mildly interested if that
opportunity presented itself. Science to him, now, just tends to tell
if it has the potential to sound good.

Jborg,
Brilliant analysis! The conundrum that was Scotty is reduced to a Rubik's
cube with stuck joints.

You know Bob. It's stuff like this that shows me how truly full of
**** you are. Condoning someone who obviously
can't comprehend even comprehend simple statements and embarks on
an out of context rampant misinterpretation for purposes unknown
that tells me that you're no different than the Middiots and ssshhhhiees.
You don't want to discuss audio. You want to play the game and
be accepted by the nutters who give audio a bad name.
But you know....truly happy people don't need to do that for kicks, Bob.
So what's eating you? You've got deep-seated issues that need to be
resolved or you'll never get over Brian.

ScottW