[ScottW]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 29, 3:19 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Jun 29, 1:10 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!





wrote:
On Jun 29, 1:08 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Jun 29, 10:54 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Jun 28, 7:57 pm, "ScottW" wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
oglegroups.com...

On Jun 28, 12:22 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Jun 27, 9:45 pm, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!

wrote:
On Jun 27, 6:34 pm, ScottW wrote:

On Jun 27, 1:32 am, Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!
Hm. Why do you oppose test posts? It will keep the volume on
RAO up.

They're boring. I'm opposed to your boring posts too, note.

Scintillating.

Another English word that has apparently taken on a new
definition.

Main Entry: scintillating
Function: adjective
Date: 1846
: brilliantly lively, stimulating, or witty a scintillating
conversation

Nope. You're wrong and not scintillating at all.

I was, of course, referring to the fact that you apparently believe
your OT posts to be something other than selfish and boring.

It's all in perspective.

Indeed.

Your perspective of your posts versus the rest of the world's
perspective of your posts.

While my posts may be boring, they "at least" have intelligence,
logic
and humor going for them.

I never met an aficianodo grade school trash talk before.

While I've never met a more mangled sentence.

One would think the typical person of above average intelligence
could determine and insert the appropriate missing preposition.
You're obviously not at that level.
Here, let me help.

I never met an oficianado of grade school trash talk before.

Better now?

LMAO!

What language is this
is? What were you trying to say?

What have you got?

LOL!

I'm so glad you broke. Now I can tell you what I think about you
again.

Controlling you if even briefly has no value to me.

You didn't control me. I abided by an agreement, you broke the
agreement. Oh well.

You had an agreement. I engaged in a test.

Ah, the inevitable.

Your "I'll be watching," signalling agreement, is what I recall.
Please post the "I'll do this as a test until I don't feel like it any
more" post. I missed it.

Test conclusive. You're an audio nothing

still waiting for those scintillating audio discussions...

They flew right over your nest.



and this group
goes dead if audio is all there is to discuss.

And this is a huge concern to you...why? If nobody is interested in
discussing audio here, what logical jump in your 'mind' signals
anyone's interest in extreme right-wing propaganda?

Think of it this way...would you freak out if someone
brought up music during the social segment
at an Iowa caucus meeting?

Let's look at it this way: if there was a committee meeting at the
local town council discussing building new roads, and somebody (you,
for example) started ranting about Islam, would you "freak out"?

Absolutely, the was no gavel and call to order and there never
will be.


BTW, because I pity you does not mean that I am "freaking out."

Its a social gathering. If a little off-topic fills in the blanks,
what do you care?

A little? LOL!

Sure, everything is going to be OK. There, there.

So what you're saying is that you have accepted the position of "life
of the party" without being drafted for it. My, what an ego.

Life of the party? Hardly....unless it's one of your parties.
Just breathing at your parties would bring life.

ScottW