[ScottW]

On Jun 26, 3:24 pm, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net wrote:
Jenn said:

None of the posts in question qualifies as spam. Yours was a curiosity,
and Scottie's are offal. Notice how Witless just caved when I zeroed in
on his mental defects? That's one of his touchiest buttons.
George, I have to say that I made an error in not including you in a
list of those who create the most off-topic spam here.

Spam is commercial in nature. Examples are posts that say "click here
for naked beauties" and "cheap software!" I don't create *any* spam.
Never have, never will.

Also, I disagree as to the "OT" rubric. I have repeatedly stated, and
supported, my opinion that ridicule and mockery of audio religionists


What is an audio religionist?
Your tendency to stereotype people based on wether they support
or oppose your "resistance" is obvious and has nothing to do
with their audio preferences.


are peripherally related to the nominal subject of this group. If you
accept my reasoning, that excuses some portion of my posts from being
patently OT.

Absolute crock of BS rationalization for
your childish self amusement.



BTW, if you're stuck for a term to refer to OT posts, how about noise?

I personally don't care if there are off-topic posts or not. It just
seems odd that someone who obviously DOES care creates so much of it
himself.

Scottie's estrangement from logical thinking is a matter of historial
record. Like his idol the Krooborg, Terrierdork has his own private
dialect of human language.

Complete and utter BS from the vinyphobic middiot.
But thanks for demonstrating your Kreuger Derangement Syndrome
and how it plays into your bogus "audio religionists" stereotype.

ScottW